Hartford Fire Ins. v. Sambrano (In Re Sambrano)
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Decision and Order on Motion to Exclude Witnesses and Evidence
LEIF M. CLARK, Bankruptcy Judge.
Came on for consideration the foregoing matter. Defendant moves to exclude certain witnesses and evidence for failure to make appropriate disclosures under Rule 26. Plaintiff counters that it either made adequate disclosures, or that the failures were harmless, or that excluding evidence would be highly prejudicial.
For the reasons stated herein, the court grants the motion in part and denies the motion in part.
Background
Hartford Fire Insurance Company (the “Plaintiff’ or “Hartford”)…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Primrose Operating Co. v. National American InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Design Strategy, Inc. v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- R.C. Olmstead, Inc. v. CU Interface, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- CQ, Inc. v. TXU Mining Co., L.P.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Reed v. Iowa Marine and Repair Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kenneth Bisig v. Time Warner CableCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- LaPine v. City of DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
- Mai-Tram H Tran v. City of Carrollton, TexasDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2026
- Web Apps Agency, LLC v. HNTB CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2025