Legal Opinion

McKaney v. Foreman

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 2004No. CV-04-0032-SAPublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JONES, Chief Justice.

¶ 1 In light of principles set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), and Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584, 122 S.Ct. 2428, 153 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002), as well as the requirements of the Arizona Constitution and laws, we decide in today’s case whether, as a condition to the pursuit of capital punishment by the State, aggravating factors described in A.R.S. § 13-703(F) (Supp.2003) must be specifically alleged in the charging document and supported by evidence of probable cause. For the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Schriro v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. State v. EllisonArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. RoqueArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. AndersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. MorrisArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. DannArizona Supreme Court · 2009

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API