Legal Opinion
F & H Construction v. ITT Hartford Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 5, 2004No. C042707PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BLEASE, Acting P. J.
F & H Construction (F&H) appeals from the judgment in favor of ITT Hartford Insurance Group (Hartford) on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment.
F&H brought suit against Hartford under a commercial general liability insurance (CGLI) policy issued to Hartford’s insured, L. O’Reilly & Son, Inc. (O’Reilly), after O’Reilly declared bankruptcy.
F&H had contracted with Contra Costa Water District to build ,a water facility pumping plant. F&H entered into a subcontract with O’Reilly for the manufacture and delivery of grade A-50 steel pile caps with a load capacity…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Vicor Corp. v. Vigilant InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Calfarm Insurance v. KrusiewiczCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Sony Computer Entertainment America, Inc. v. American Home Assurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Wisconsin Pharmacal Company, LLC v. Nebraska Cultures of California, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
- Hindin v. RustCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.