Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re McCarty

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 23, 1934No. Crim. No. 271PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIFFIN, J., pro tem.

This is an original application for a writ of habeas corpus brought in this court seeking the discharge of petitioner upon the ground that the evidence produced at her preliminary examination did not show reasonable or probable cause that a crime had been committed by her.

The petitioner, together with one Fong Quong, were held to answer by the committing magistrate for the crime of murder alleged to have been committed in the county of Kings, on or about the eighth day of December, 1933.

Petitioner, of course, cannot, in these proceedings, test the sufficiency of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HeacockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  2. Ex Parte ViceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  3. In re MesquitaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. In Re CordishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. People v. PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. People v. NagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. People v. WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. People v. JaurequiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. People v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API