Haas v. Kasnot
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Horace Stern,
The introduction of legally inadmissible testimony at the trial of these cases necessitates a reversal of the judgments entered in favor of the defendant.
On a May evening in 1947 Anthony Cihal, Jr. was driving a Chevrolet car, wherein Raymond N. Haas and Edward Reiter were passengers, in a westerly direction on the right-hand side of West Carson Street in Pittsburgh between the northerly street-car track and the curbstone. Andrew Kasnot, who was driving a DeSoto car in an easterly direction on that street straddling the southerly rail of the southerly…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Allen v. MackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Freedman v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Commonwealth v. NobleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Commonwealth v. WerntzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- General Electric Credit Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Commonwealth v. EVANSSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Bentivoglio v. RalstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Cody v. S.K.F. Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. GreenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.