Legal Opinion
Forty Exchange Co. v. Cohen
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided July 18, 1984PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
David B. Saxe, J.
A. INTRODUCTION
I have been invited by the plaintiff to journey to, and even beyond, the present boundaries of New York tort law.1 For the reasons set out in this decision, I cannot accept that invitation.
B. THE FACTS
The essential facts are as follows: The plaintiff, the Forty Exchange Company, a partnership (40 Exchange), was the owner of the land and building known as 40 Exchange Place in the Wall Street section of the Borough of Manhattan in New York City. In January of 1970, 40 Exchange and a law firm, Mendes & Mount, entered into a lease for office…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- People v. HobsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Guard-Life Corp. v. S. Parker Hardware Manufacturing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Israel v. Wood Dolson Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Bing v. ThunigNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Woods v. LancetNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Telerate Systems, Inc. v. CaroDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Fanarjian v. MoskowitzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
- Rubin v. DondyshCivil Court of the City of New York · 1989
- In Re Ames Dept. Stores, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- All State Vehicles v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.