State v. Callahan
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
Defendant brings forward assignments of error relating to (1) the denial of his motion for a continuance on the grounds that he had not been arraigned, (2) the admission of evidence over his objection, (3) the denial of his motion to examine the undercover officer’s notes and (4) the refusal of the court to grant his request for jury instructions regarding jurisdiction. We have considered each of defendant’s contentions and find no prejudicial error in his trial.
The State’s evidence tended to show that on 10 April 1983 Officer Kenneth Knox, a narcotics detective for the Union…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Otey v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State v. DetterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. BatdorfSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. McCotterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- State v. TeasleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. BerrymanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- State v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. LalindeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.