Goetzinger v. Woodley
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ROSE, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs in error, who occupied the same position below, assign as error the entry of a compulsory nonsuit at the close of their evidence and the exclusion of certain testimony offered by them. These are matters which cannot be considered by us, unless the facts out of which they arose are made to appear by a proper bill of exceptions. While the suit was brought as far back as 1916, it was not tried until the January special term in the year 1926. On the 28th of January, after the judgment complained of had been entered, an order was made giving 90 days to file and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Exporters of Manufacturers' Products, Inc. v. Butterworth-Judson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Malony v. AdsitSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Origet v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1918
3Cited by13 opinions
- Osborn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
- McCuing v. BovayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- United States v. KonstovichCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
- H. P. Cummings Const. Co. v. Marbleloid Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1931
- Baltimore & O. R. v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.