Legal Opinion

Putnam v. Industrial Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1932No. 5222PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStraup, J.

This is an industrial case. Chew, the applicant, was injured in Salt Lake City on the night of January 8, 1931. The controversy involves the question as to who was his employer and whether at the time of the injury he had three or more workmen in his employ. On January 21, 1931, a report by the physician who attended the applicant was filed with the commission setting forth the nature of the injury and giving L. A. Putnam as the employer. On January 27, 1931, the applicant filed a -written application with the commission seeking compensation, and alleged that Lawrence Putnam was his employer,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. DudleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  2. Preble v. Architectural Iron Workers' Union of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1931
  3. Bobrow v. United States Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In Re BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Alvarado v. TuckerUtah Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Spencer v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Underhill v. Alameda Elementary School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Spencer v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1933

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API