Legal Opinion

Claflin v. Cottman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1881No. 8593PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Bicknell, C. C.

This was an action of replevin by the appellants against the appellees. George Hazzard, one of the appellees, bought the goods in controversy from the appellants upon credit, by fraud and false pretences. Before the credit expired, he gave the appellants for the debt the following note:

*59“$1388.23. New York, August 10th, 1878.
“Twenty days after date we promise to pay to the order of H. B. Claflin & Co., value received, thirteen hundred and eighty-three &s dollars, at Third National Bank in New York. [Signed] George W. Hazzard & Co.,
“Due Sept. 2, ’78. Auburn, Ind.”

Hazzard was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Aurora Fire Insurance v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Jeffersonville, Madison, & Indianapolis Railroad v. CoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Hopkins v. Greensburg, Knightstown, & Clarksburg Turnpike Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Burnett v. OvertonIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Emmons v. NewmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Curme, Dunn & Co. v. RauhIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Levi v. KraminerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Hoham v. Aukerman-Tuesburg Motors, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API