Proctor v. Hobart M. Cable Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Sanilac; Beach, J. Assumpsit by William H. Proctor against the Hobart M. Cable Company for breach of a contract of employment. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.
Plaintiff, a traveling salesman in the employ of defendant corporation, brought suit against it in justice’s court, filing the following bill of particulars of his claim:
“Feb. 2,1903.
To balance due on Dec. 1902 salary and expenses.-_______ $93 60
To balance due for January, 1903, and as damages for breach of contract mentioned in declaration........... 250 00
Total — .................................................$343 60
Credit by notes received from A. H. Becket______________ 135 00
Balance................................................$208 60”
Plaintiff recovered judgment before the justice,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Detlaff v. Ideal Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906
3Cited by4 opinions
- Molyneux v. Twin Falls Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1934
- Crawley v. Studebaker Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Charles G. Clapp Co. v. McClearySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
- Salon v. W. M. Finck & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942