Legal Opinion

Detlaff v. Ideal Manufacturing Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1906No. Docket No. 42PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Wayne; Rohnert, J. Assumpsit by Anthony J. Detlaff against the Ideal Manufacturing Company for work and labor. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defóndant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Blair,, J.

The plaintiff, in 1899, was the foreman of several departments of the defendant’s manufacturing business, and, among others, of the cast-iron toy department, at a salary of $1,158 a year. At the end of that year his salary was raised to $1,400, and he also, made a contract with the defendant, through its superintendent, Mr. Bush, by which he was to finish up and assemble the castings for toy pistols and prepare them for market at an agreed price, the defendant furnishing the rough castings, advancing the pay-roll and all other expenses. Plaintiff was to be paid for his work as the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Proctor v. Hobart M. Cable Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API