Davis v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
LATTIMORE, Judge.
— Since this case was affirmed appellant has filed in the trial court a motion asking that the trial judge who tried this case, enter a nunc pro tunc order granting appellant eighty days from the adjournment of the trial term of the court below within which to file statement of facts and bills of exception, — all of which is shown in connection with appellant’s motion for rehearing. Responding to appellant’s said motion the trial court, on March 30, 1930, made such nunc pro tunc order. This he was entirely without authority to do. Article 828, C. C.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Quarles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
- Knight v. WaggonerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Texas Harvester Co. v. Wilson-Whaley Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Mayhew v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.