Lewis v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The court on appeal affirmed the judgment, and would not consider the statement of facts, because filed without an order of court to that effect, after adjournment of the term. After this affirmance, the following proceedings were had in the County Court at a subsequent term: “County Court, Criminal Minutes, January Term, 1895. “In County Court, Ellis County, Texas, January Term, 1895.—Tues-day, January 29, 1895. • “The State of Texas “y. “4033. “Arthur Lewis.
Read the full summary
The court on appeal affirmed the judgment, and would not consider the statement of facts, because filed without an order of court to that effect, after adjournment of the term. After this affirmance, the following proceedings were had in the County Court at a subsequent term: “County Court, Criminal Minutes, January Term, 1895. “In County Court, Ellis County, Texas, January Term, 1895.—Tues-day, January 29, 1895. • “The State of Texas “y. “4033. “Arthur Lewis. “The motion of defendant to correct and supply an omission in the record coming on to be heard, and it appearing to the court, that at…
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDS027, Judge.
Appellant was convicted for playing craps, a game played with dice. The statement of facts, having been filed after the adjournment of court for the term, can not be considered, because the record fails to show an order for that purpose. The sole ground urged for reversal is the want of sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Judges all present and concurring.
2Cited by12 opinions
- Quarles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
- Dement v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
- Morse v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
- Reed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901
- Nichols v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.