Legal Opinion

Eichholtz v. Taylor

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1882No. 9676PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Morris, C.

— The appellant, who was the plaintiff below, sued the appellees upon the following promissory note:

" $500.00. Lafayette, Ind., March'9th, 1878.
“Due, 25th day of December, 1879, after date, we promise to pay to the order of Emanuel Eichholtz, the sum of $500, with interest at the rate of eight per cent, per annum after maturity, until paid, and attorneys’ fees, negotiable and payable at the office of- bankers, value received, without any *39relief whatever from valuation or appraisement laws. The ■drawers and endorsers severally waive presentment for payment, protest, notice of protest…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Holmes v. HolmesNew York Supreme Court · 1851
  2. Wade v. GuppingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Streeter v. HenleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1849
  4. Henly v. StreeterIndiana Supreme Court · 1854

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. TalbotIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Marksill Specialties, Inc. v. BargerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. SECO CHEMICALS, INC., ETC. v. StewartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Wallace v. Mertz, Admr.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1927
  5. Goss v. BowenIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API