Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 27, 1983No. 82-AB-914; CA A25040PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Claimant seeks judicial review of a decision of the Employment Appeals Board denying him unemployment compensation on the ground that he voluntarily left work without good cause. We reverse and remand to EAB.

Claimant’s application for compensation was denied by the division for the reason that claimant was discharged for misconduct. 1 Claimant requested a hearing, stating in his request: “Facts are incorrect. I don’t feel my actions were misconduct.” After a hearing, the referee reversed the division, finding that claimant was “discharged but not for misconduct.” Employer appealed. Employer’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kuraspediani v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  2. Swezey v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. Wright v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. De St. Germain v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. Cascade Corp. v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. Johnson v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. Potter v. Employment Department & Fred Meyer, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. SFR Investment Pool 1, LLC v. NewRez LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API