Citizens' Savings Bank v. Person
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus. Relator applied for maiidamus to compel respondent to order an issue framed to determine the liability of an insolvent banking corporation upon the claim of relator. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
The relator is located at Detroit, and shows that the Central Michigan Savings Bank of Lansing is indebted to it in the sum of $2,000 and upwards, upon a promissory note which it rediscounted with and indorsed to relator. After such rediscount of said note, the Central Michigan Savings Bank became insolvent, and such proceedings were thereafter had in the circuit court for Ingham county in chancery that a receiver was appointed for it, under the provisions of Act No. 205, Laws of 1887. Subsequently, the relator presented its claim under said *174note by affidavit to the receiver, who refused to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bank of Bethel v. Pahquioque BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
3Cited by15 opinions
- Kidder v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- Foster v. RowMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Bissell v. HeathMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Prather Engineering Co. v. Detroit, Flint & Saginaw RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Braun v. McPhersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.