Legal Opinion

Tipula v. Garfield Mill, Inc.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided January 30, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Complainant entered into a contract with one Clark whereby the latter agreed to make alterations to a building of the former. The contract was not filed. When $330 of the contract price fell due, Garfield Mill, Incorporated, a judgment creditor of Clark, levied on the rights and credits in the hands of complainant belonging to Clark, namely, the sum of $330. Prior thereto, Roofers Supplies, Incorporated, and Goethal, had filed in the county clerk's office mechanics' notices of intention, pursuant to section 1 of the Mechanics' Lien act as amended by P.L. 1930p. 972, and these two claim that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pfeifer v. ReimanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
  2. Tuttle v. HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
  3. Illingworth v. RoweNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1894
  4. Schmidt v. EitelNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1906

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fidelity v. McClintic-marshall CorpNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
  2. Gibraltar Mfg. Co., Inc. v. DemundNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API