Illingworth v. Rowe
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On demurrer.
1Opinion of the Court
Van Fleet, V. C.
This is an interpleader suit. Two of the defendants have demurred to the bill for want of equity. As a bill of strict inter-pleader I do not think the bill can be sustained, but if it be *361considered as a bill in the nature of a bill of interpleader, then I think it must be held to exhibit a case which clearly entitles the complainant to relief. Not relief of the kind now asked, but such relief as the court may, under a bill in the nature of a bill of interpleader, grant upon the facts admitted by the demur-rants. To state a case of strict interpleader it is necessary for the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Mohawk & Hudson Railroad v. CluteNew York Court of Chancery · 1834
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tipula v. Garfield Mill, Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934