Legal Opinion

Fidelity v. McClintic-marshall Corp

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided March 16, 1934PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The bill is filed by the sureties on the bond of the late Charles T. Kavanagh, given to secure performance of a contract between Kavanagh and the state highway commission for work on one of the state highways. The defendants are subcontractors, materialmen, the administrator of Kavanagh's estate, and the National Bronx Bank of New York. By an ex parte order taken when the bill was filed, the highway commission was directed to pay and did pay into court the balance due on the Kavanagh contract. The purpose of the bill is to ascertain the liability of complainants to the several defendants, as…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Curtis & Hill Gravel & Sand Co. v. State Highway CommissionNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1920
  2. Grover v. Bd. of Ed., Franklin Twp.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
  3. Stulz-Sickles Co. v. Fredburn Constr. Corp.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  4. Nutz v. Murray-Nutz, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1931
  5. Bd. of Education of Elizabeth v. ZincNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. SAMUEL D. WASSERMAN, INC. v. KlahreNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  2. Guerriero v. U-Drive-It Co. of NJNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  3. National Surety Corp. v. BarthNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  4. Picker v. City of BayonneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  5. JT Evans Co. v. FanelliNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API