Legal Opinion

Arthur Weil & Co. v. Board of Education

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 3, 1977No. 76-162PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilson

Following a hearing without a jury on plaintiffs petition for a writ of mandamus, an order was entered compelling defendant, the Board of Education of the City of Chicago (hereinafter “Board”) to reinstate plaintiff as a competitive bidder on the Yates Elementary School plumbing contract and to award that contract to plaintiff. The only issue raised by defendants-appellants on appeal is whether the court erred in issuing the writ of mandamus. We reverse.

On August 23, 1972, the Board, pursuant to its statutory rulemaking power (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1975, ch. 122, par. 34 — 19), established the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kravis v. Smith Marine, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Shaw v. LorenzIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  3. In Re Estate of LeichtenbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Illinois State Board of Dental Examiners v. People ex rel. CooperIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  5. People ex rel. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1957

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cardinal Glass Co. v. Board of EducationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  2. Beaver Glass & Mirror Co. v. Board of Education of Rockford School District No. 205Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  3. Leo Michuda & Son Co. v. Metropolitan Sanitary DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  4. Weisberg v. ByrneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  5. Korte-Reinheimer v. City Council of Palos HillsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API