Legal Opinion

People v. Hicks

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 19, 1987No. 2-86-0958PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nash

After a jury trial, defendant, Joe Hicks, was convicted of possession of incendiary devices (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 38, par. 20 — 2(a)), transportation of incendiary devices (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 38, par. 20 — 2(a)), and unlawful use of weapons (111. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 38, par. 24 — 1(a)(7)). He appeals, contending that he was denied (1) effective assistance of counsel because his trial counsel failed to present exculpatory expert testimony; (2) a fair trial because the jury instructions did not define the term “arson”; and (3) a fair trial because the prosecutor’s closing argument…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. People v. CollinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Collins v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. People v. BryantIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  5. People v. MacKIllinois Supreme Court · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. RamseySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  2. People v. WashingtonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  3. People v. HowardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. People v. MarkiewiczAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  5. People v. BodohAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API