Legal Opinion

Patton v. Mutual of Enumclaw Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 20, 2010No. 03-11-12054 A134159PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

242 P.3d 624 (2010)

238 Or. App. 101

Lowell E. PATTON, Plaintiff-Respondent, Cross-Appellant,

v.

MUTUAL OF ENUMCLAW INSURANCE COMPANY, a Washington corporation, Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Respondent, and

Hopp Insurance Agency, Inc., an Oregon corporation; and Randy W. Hopp, Defendants-Cross-Respondents.

03-11-12054; A134159.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted September 18, 2009.

Decided October 20, 2010.

Thomas M. Christ, Portland, argued the cause for appellant—cross-respondent. With him on the briefs were Julie A. Smith and Cosgrave Vergeer Kester LLP.

Robert K. Udziela, Portland, argued…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Fazzolari v. Portland School District No. 1JOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. Fred S. James & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Brown v. J. C. Penney Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Sandford v. Chevrolet Division of General MotorsOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Employers Ins. of Wausau v. Tektronix, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Patton v. Mut. of Enumclaw Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  2. Safeco Insurance v. MasoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. Deardorff v. FarnsworthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. Patton v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. Harkness v. PlattenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API