Legal Opinion

In re Ambulatory Pain PumpChondrolysis Products Liability Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided April 14, 2010No. MDL No. 2139PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING TRANSFER

KATHRYN H. VRATIL, Acting Chairman.

Before the entire Panel *: Plaintiffs in one action pending in the District of Minnesota and two actions pending in the Southern District of Ohio have moved, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, to centralize this litigation in the District of Minnesota. The litigation currently consists of the 102 actions listed on Schedule A.1 Movants request that the Panel exclude from centralization an additional twelve actions (seven Eastern District of Kentucky actions and five Southern District of Ohio actions), on the ground that they are too…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Shoulder Pain Pump-Chondrolysis Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2008

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Krumpelbeck v. Breg, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API