Murray v. Educational Testing Service
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GARWOOD, Circuit Judge:
This case involves a contractual dispute between plaintiff-appellant Kerry Murray (Murray) and defendant-appellee Educational Testing Service (ETS), the administrator of the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT). Based on the undisputed facts, the district court granted summary judgment in favor of ETS. We affirm.
Facts and Proceedings Below
ETS is a non-profit educational organization that administers the SAT I: Reasoning Test (SAT I). The SAT I is a multiple-choice test designed to provide students and colleges with a uniform measure of verbal and mathematical reasoning…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Eric Smith v. Steve Brenoettsy, Lieutenant, John P. Whitley, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Merritt-Campbell, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Rxp Products, Inc., Defendant-Counter Plaintiff-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Susan E. Johnson v. Educational Testing ServiceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- K. D. v. Educational Testing ServiceNew York Supreme Court · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- National Council of Examiners for Engineering & Surveying v. Cameron-OrtizDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2009
- Hildebrant v. Educational Testing ServiceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Giri v. National Board of Medical ExaminersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- Opinion Number, Louisiana Attorney General Reports2004