Legal Opinion

Cumming v. Putnam Realty, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided December 18, 2002No. CA 02-293Published

1Opinion of the Court

92 S.W.3d 698 (2002)

80 Ark.App. 153

Mike CUMMING, Mizan Rahman, and M & M Properties

v.

PUTNAM REALTY, INC.

No. CA 02-293.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Divisions III, IV.

December 18, 2002.

Eichenbaum, Liles & Heister, P.A., by: Christopher O. Parker and Mitchell L. Berry, Little Rock, for appellants.

Wright, Lindsey & Jennings LLP, by: Justin T. Allen, Little Rock, for appellee.

JOHN F. STROUD, JR., Chief Judge.

This case arises from the trial court's grant of summary judgment to appellee, Putnam Realty, Inc., awarding it $28,317.50, plus prejudgment and postjudgment interest. It involves the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sturgis v. SkokosSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Holytrent Properties, Inc. v. Valley Park Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Parkerson v. LincolnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Cumming v. Putnam Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API