Legal Opinion

Cumming v. Putnam Realty, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided December 18, 2002No. CA 02-293PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John P. Stroud, Jr., Chief Judge.

This case arises from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to appellee, Putnam Realty, Inc., awarding it $28,317.50, plus prejudgment and postjudgment interest. It involves the construction of two contracts, a commission agreement between the parties and a lease agreement between appellants and Crown Communications. The dispute centers on the appropriate commission fee that appellants are obligated to pay appellee for negotiating the leasing arrangement between Crown Communications and appellants with respect to property owned by appellants. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sturgis v. SkokosSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Holytrent Properties, Inc. v. Valley Park Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Parkerson v. LincolnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Addington v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Schmoll v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008
  3. Cumming v. Putnam Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Schmoll v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API