Legal Opinion

In re Erickson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 12, 1919No. 21,864PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Saline district court; Dallas Grover, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

Has an informant the right to appeal from an order of the probate court approving the verdict of a jury finding that a subject of inquiry is not feeble-minded? A negative answer was given in the district court, and the informant complains of the ruling.

The inquest was initiated by J. E. Erickson, who alleged in his affidavit that Erick Erickson was feeble-minded, incapable of managing his affairs, and he asked that a guardian of the person and estate of Erick Erickson be appointed. He did not state his relationship fio or interest in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Paxton v. GuinotteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  2. Studabaker v. MarkleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Galbreath v. BlackIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Nimblet v. ChaffeeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1852
  5. Ruhlman v. RuhlmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cook v. Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1923
  2. State v. BatemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  3. State Ex Rel. Wilkerson v. SkinkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  4. In re WadleighSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  5. Logston v. NeedhamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API