Legal Opinion

Logston v. Needham

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 11, 1933No. 31,283PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

This was an action to recover from the executor of the estate of Amanda A. Jenkins for services rendered and goods and supplies furnished her during her lifetime by the plaintiff.

The claim originally filed was stated as a verified account for $20,000, to which was attached a supplement. The supplement contains a statement of claimant’s being taken into the home of Mr. and Mrs. Jenkins when he was about four years of age, his staying with them until he was 21 years of age, when Jenkins gave him two horses, and a little later he went to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Woltz v. First Trust Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  2. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. DwyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  3. Griffith v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  4. Wiggins v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  5. Ensey v. HinesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of RogersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  2. Johnson v. LanderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  3. Jones v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  4. Brown v. BrewerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  5. In Re Estate of MueselerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API