Legal Opinion

Mahoney v. Murray

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 27, 1934No. Civ. No. 9089PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Action for damages for personal injuries. The case was tried before a jury. Judgment went in favor of defendant, and plaintiff appeals upon the ground that the jury was erroneously instructed.

The accident occurred on the highway near the city of Palo Alto. The highway at this place is forty feet wide with four lanes designated by three white lines. Vehicles traveling in a northerly direction used the two lanes on the easterly side of the highway, and vehicles going in a southerly direction used the two lanes on the westerly side. Appellant was a pedestrian attempting to cross from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Douglas v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Barham v. WidingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Reuter v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. De Nardi v. PalancaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Schatte v. MauriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Christiansen v. HollingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. Dawson v. BoydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Casalegno v. LeonardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Lopez v. WislerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. O'Connor v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API