Legal Opinion

McFarland v. Kelly

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 20, 1963No. Civ. 7114PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, P. J.

This action arose out of an automobile accident in which defendant ran into the rear of plaintiff’s ear. At the trial, the jury found defendant liable, but awarded plaintiff only $2,000 damages. Plaintiff moved for a new trial and the court granted the motion.

The principal conflict in the evidence at the trial concerned plaintiff’s injuries. It was established that shortly after the accident plaintiff was suffering from manifestations of a whiplash injury when she noticed a swelling on her neck under her chin about the size of a walnut. The swelling and her whiplash injury caused her some…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sinz v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Koyer v. McComberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Benjamin v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Sitkei v. FrimelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Bray v. RosenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Collins v. Sutter Memorial HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Cox v. Certified Grocers of Cal. Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Nichols v. HastCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Wagner v. SingletonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Chamberlin v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API