Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Crowden v. Dandurand

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 16, 1998No. 80437PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENTON, Chief Justice.

At issue is the permissible scope of a subpoena for the production of medical and employment records at a deposition.

In the underlying lawsuit, relator Roger Crowden sought damages for injuries incurred in an automobile wreck. On July 10, 1997, the defendant issued thirteen subpoenas duces tecum for depositions scheduled fifteen minutes apart on July 31, 1997. Twelve subpoenas required Crowden’s medical providers to:

Produce and bring with you: any and all records in your possession pertaining to Roger W. Crowden ... including but not limited to, hospital records, office…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. McNutt v. KeetSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  2. Brandt v. PelicanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  3. State Ex Rel. Plank v. KoehrSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  4. Bledsoe v. Northside Supply & Development Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  5. State Ex Rel. Williams v. BuzardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Ford Motor Co. v. MessinaSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  2. State Ex Rel. Dean v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  3. Beckmann v. Miceli Homes, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Smulls v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  5. State Ex Rel. Delmar Gardens North Operating, LLC v. GaertnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API