Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Williams v. Buzard

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 5, 1945No. 39602PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHyde, J.

Mandamus to require entry of order to compel answers to relator’s interrogatories by the Kansas City Public Service Company (hereinafter called the defendant) in her suit for damages .for personal injuries.

The principal question is whether the new civil code [Laws Mo. 1943, pp. 353-357, Discovery, secs. 85-89; Mo. Stat. Ann. 847.1-847.145, Discovery, secs. 847.85-847.89] authorizes the court to require the defendant therein to answer the following question:

“(8) Please state the names and addresses of all persons whose names and addresses were taken by any employee of your corporation at the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Evans v. BroaddusSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  2. State Ex Rel. Page v. TerteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  3. State Ex Rel. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. HallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  4. State Ex Rel. Iron Fireman Corp. v. WardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  5. Ex parte BrockmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Franklin v. FranklinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  2. Belding v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  3. Wipfler v. BaslerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  4. Hemminghaus v. FergusonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  5. Johnson v. CoxSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API