State Ex Rel. Ford Motor Co. v. Messina
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
DUANE BENTON, Judge.
In the circuit court, plaintiffs have sought depositions of five executives of Ford Motor Company. The respondent judge denied Ford’s motion for a protective order, or to stay and quash the depositions. Ford seeks extraordinary relief. This Court issued a preliminary writ of prohibition, now made absolute, as modified. Mo. Const, art. V, sec. ⅛.
I
Between 1979 and 1984, Ford developed the “Bronco II” vehicle and equipped it with tires from Continental General Tire Company. In 1997, plaintiffs were injured, allegedly when their 1987 Bronco II went out of control due to a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Rodriguez v. Suzuki Motor Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1996
- Giddens v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2000
- Crown Central Petroleum Corp. v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Charles F. Curry and Company v. HedrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- State on the Information of Reed v. ReardonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- G. Steven Cox v. Kansas City Chiefs Football Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2015
- State v. LarsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
- Hope v. Nissan North America, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- State Ex Rel. Coca-Cola Co. v. NixonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
- CREST INFINITI, II, LP v. SwintonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.