Legal Opinion

Jung v. Neraz

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1888No. 6013PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from Comal. Tried below before the Hon. T. M. Paschal. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Acker, Presiding Judge.

Appellants brought this suit against appellee to prevent him from establishing a cemetery upon a plot of four acres of land “situated in front of, contiguous and so near to appellants’ residences that a cemetery there would render the homes of appellants unfit for habitation or the purposes for which they were designed, and thereby destroy their value and usefulness.”

The writ of injunction was issued on the twenty-sixth of. March, 1886, on the fiat of Hon. A. W. Dillard, “special district judge for Uvalde county.”

The petition alleges that the title to the land on which…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Crosstex North Texas Pipeline, L.P., N/K/A Enlink North Texas Pipeline, Lp v. Andrew Gardiner and Shannon GardinerTexas Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Hindman v. Texas Lime CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Dunn v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Madison v. Ducktown Sulphur, Copper & Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ReedTexas Supreme Court · 1891

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API