Legal Opinion

Union Railroad v. United Steelworkers of America

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 2, 2001No. 97-3680, 98-6511UnknownCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROTH, Circuit Judge:

These consolidated cases present the question whether a federal district court has subject matter jurisdiction to adjudicate challenges to changes to a collective bargaining agreement, made in connection with a rail merger authorized by the Surface Transportation Board (STB). The District Court and the STB concluded that the latter has exclusive authority to resolve labor disputes arising out of STB-approved rail consolidations. For the reasons set out below, we will affirm the decision of the District Court and deny the petition for review of the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Detroit & Toledo Shore Line Railroad v. United Transportation UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. American Train Dispatchers' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. New York Dock Railway and Brooklyn Eastern District Terminal v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  5. United States v. LowdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Union Railroad Company v. United Steelworkers of America United Steelworkers of America - District 10 United Steelworkers of America - Local 3263, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio-Clc v. United States of America and Surface Transportation Board, Union Railroad Company ("Urr") and Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad Company ("B&le"), IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API