Union Railroad v. United Steelworkers of America
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROTH, Circuit Judge:
These consolidated cases present the question whether a federal district court has subject matter jurisdiction to adjudicate challenges to changes to a collective bargaining agreement, made in connection with a rail merger authorized by the Surface Transportation Board (STB). The District Court and the STB concluded that the latter has exclusive authority to resolve labor disputes arising out of STB-approved rail consolidations. For the reasons set out below, we will affirm the decision of the District Court and deny the petition for review of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Detroit & Toledo Shore Line Railroad v. United Transportation UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. American Train Dispatchers' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- New York Dock Railway and Brooklyn Eastern District Terminal v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- United States v. LowdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Union Railroad Company v. United Steelworkers of America United Steelworkers of America - District 10 United Steelworkers of America - Local 3263, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio-Clc v. United States of America and Surface Transportation Board, Union Railroad Company ("Urr") and Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad Company ("B&le"), IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001