Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas
This controversy started with a union demand on behalf of the nonoperating employees for a general 25-cent-per-hour wage increase and a requirement of six months’ advance notice of impending layoffs and abolition of job positions. The demand was made of virtually all Class I railroads, including Florida East Coast Railway Co. (hereinafter called FEC). The dispute underwent negotiations and mediation as required by the Railway Labor Act.1 When those procedures proved unsuccessful, a Presidential Emergency Board was cre*241ated under § 10 of the Act,2 which after hearings recommended a general pay…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. BurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Republic Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by146 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Jacksonville Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Detroit & Toledo Shore Line Railroad v. United Transportation UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. American Train Dispatchers' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Burlington Northern Railroad v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way EmployesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
141 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.