Ciapanna v. Lincoln Fire Insurance
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
The parties agree that the defendant issued the $2,000 policy of fire insurance involved in this action, and that the policy was in effect at all times mentioned in the complaint. It covers a small dwelling house owned by the plaintiff. The parties also agree that two fires visited the premises, one on March 15, and the other on August 15, 1933. The damages inflicted by the first fire are in dispute. No repairs were made after that fire. The parties agree that the second fire caused additional damage to the extent of $500.
The question presented by this appeal is whether the circuit court…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hamilton v. Liverpool, London & Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Morley v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- McNees v. Southern InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1897
- Astrich v. German-American Ins.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1904
- Schrepfer v. Rockford InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- School District No. 1 v. Globe & Republic Insurance Co. of AmericaMontana Supreme Court · 1965
- Keesling v. Western Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- Boston Insurance Co. v. A. H. Jacobson Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- TE Connolly, Inc. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945