Legal Opinion

Baughman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 9, 1995PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIRILLO, Judge.

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) appeals from an order entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Beaver County, declaring that appellee’s underinsurance policy limits under the applicable State Farm policy are $100,000.00. For the following reasons, we quash this appeal.

At trial before the Honorable Robert C. Reed, the parties stipulated to the following facts: On March 4, 1988, appellee, Amy D. Baughman (the “Insured”), sustained personal injuries as a result of a motor vehicle accident. The Insured, with the consent of State Farm — her insurer,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McCormick v. Northeastern BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Wertz v. AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Storti v. Minnesota Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Palladino v. DunnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Miller v. KramerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Motorists Mutual Insurance Company v. PinkertonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Diamond Reo Truck Co. v. Mid-Pacific Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Newman Development Group of Pottstown, LLC v. Genuardfs Family Markets, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. The Arches Condominium Association v. L. RobinsonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Ryan v. GordonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API