Legal Opinion

Storti v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 27, 1984No. 3066PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Frederick R. Storti has appealed from a declaratory judgment construing in favor of the insurer a group disability policy of insurance issued by Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Company. After careful review, we affirm.

The provisions of Pa.R.C.P. 1601(a) require that in an action for declaratory judgment “[t]he practice and procedure shall follow, as nearly as may be, the rules governing the Action in Equity.” This Court, in Hertz v. Hertz, 302 Pa.Super. 259, 448 A.2d 626 (1982), interpreted the rule to require “an adjudication in accordance with Pa.R.C.P. 1517, the filing of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DERRY TP., ETC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Ozanich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Barton v. PencoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Greenwood Township v. Kefo, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Brown v. Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Chalkey v. RoushSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Daley-Sand v. West American InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. In the Interest of CoastSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Lane Enterprises, Inc. v. L.B. Foster Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Chalkey v. RoushSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API