Legal Opinion
Holmes v. Colorado Coalition for the Homeless Long Term Disability Plan
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 12, 2014No. 13-1175PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McHUGH, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Lucrecia Carpió Holmes appeals the district court’s ruling that her claim for disability benefits under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) is barred due to her failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
Ms. Holmes is a former employee of the Colorado Coalition for the Homeless (the Coalition) and participated in an employee benefits plan funded, in part, by a disability insurance policy through Union Security Insurance Company (Union Security). 1 The benefits were provided…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- United States National Bank v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- CIGNA Corp. v. AmaraSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. SchoonejongenSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Safe Streets Alliance v. HickenlooperCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Almont Ambulatory Surgery Center, LLC v. UnitedHealth Group, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Tronsgard v. FBL Fin. Grp., Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2018
- M. S. v. Premera Blue CrossCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Tricore Reference LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.