Legal Opinion
State v. Richards
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided June 1, 1995No. 20548PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LANSING, Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction following a guilty plea for violation of Idaho’s telephone harassment statute, I.C. § 18-6710. The appellant contends that the statute under which he was convicted is unconstitutionally overbroad and vague. He also contends that the prosecutor violated the plea agreement by making a sentencing recommendation and that the sentence imposed is unduly harsh. We conclude that I.C. § 18-6710 is not unconstitutional, that the plea agreement was not dishonored by the prosecution and that the sentence imposed was not unreasonable.…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- State v. Azad Haji AbdullahIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. CobbIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
- Galloway v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- State v. KorsenIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
- Wagner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.