Legal Opinion

McGulpin v. Bessmer

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 13, 1950No. 47594Published

1Opinion of the Court

43 N.W.2d 121 (1950)

McGULPIN

v.

BESSMER et al.

No. 47594.

Supreme Court of Iowa.

June 13, 1950.

Rehearing Denied October 23, 1950.

Bach & Arnett, of Hazard, Kentucky, for appellant.

Lane & Waterman, and Cook, Blair & Balluff, all of Davenport, for appellees.

GARFIELD, Justice.

The first count of plaintiff's amended petition charges defendants, Drs. Bessmer and Middleton, and their employee Dr. Spang with want of due care, skill and knowledge in treating varicose veins in plaintiff's leg, resulting in gangrene and amputation of the leg. The second count alleges defendants and Dr. Spang, following an…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Sinz v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Hodgson v. BigelowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Whetstine v. MoravecSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  4. Eaves v. City of OttumwaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  5. Ramberg v. MorganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API