Legal Opinion

Weinbrenner v. McCall

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 21, 1960No. 30040PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOERNER, Commissioner.

This is an action to recover the sum of $1,200 claimed to have been loaned by the ■decedent, J. R. Weinbrenner, to the defendant. The suit originated in the Magistrate Court of the City of St. Louis, where a judgment was rendered in favor of defendant. On appeal by plaintiff to the Circuit Court the case was tried de novo by the court alone, a jury having been waived, and resulted in a judgment for plaintiff. Following an unavailing motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.

Plaintiff has not favored us with a brief, ibut has filed a motion to dismiss the defendant’s…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ambrose v. M. F. A. Co-Operative Ass'n of St. ElizabethSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  2. Page v. Laclede Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  3. Peterson Co. v. LandesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cole v. ColeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Lane v. KattMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. McDonald v. PlasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. Walker Bros., Inc. v. J. K. Seear (U.S.A.) Ltd.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1962
  5. City of Meta v. HagenhoffMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API