Peterson Co. v. Landes

CAVE, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff (respondent)' and against defendant (appellant) for $2000.

We are immediately confronted with a motion to dismiss the appeal because appellant’s brief does not comply with 42 V.A. M.S. Supreme Court Rules, rule 1.08, in certain respects.

The material part of this rule, as amended, effective December 1, 1954, reads: “1.08 * * * The brief for appellant shall 'contain: (1) A concise statement of the grounds on which the jurisdiction of the review court is invoked; ■ (2) A fair and concise statement of the facts without…