Legal Opinion

State v. MacKenzie

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 6, 1965PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarden, J.

On exceptions. (1) to the denial of a pretrial motion to suppress evidence and (2) to the trial admission of the evidence to which the motion to suppress had been addressed, — each before a different member of the Superior Court.

The facts, derived from the testimony presented at the hearing on the motion to suppress, out of which exception (1) arises, are as follows:

On the night of March 3-4, 1963 the Store of one Hikel was forcibly entered and 2 six-packs of bottled beer (Budweiser), several wrist watches (1 Admiral and 13 Timex), and a coin collection, consisting of both old and mint coins,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. People v. ChismMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Allan L. Robbins, Warden, Maine State Prison v. Kenneth MacKenzieCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
  3. State v. KoucoulesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  4. State v. WarnerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
  5. State v. BrochuSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API