Legal Opinion
State v. Brochu
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided December 12, 1967PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMSON, Chief Justice.
This case is before us on report from an interlocutory order or ruling denying a motion to supress evidence obtained on an allegedly unlawful search and seizure. Maine Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 37A(b) (appeal of interlocutory ruling), and Rule 41(e) (search and seizure); U.S.Constitution, Fourth Amendment, and Maine Constitution Article I, Sec. 5 (unreasonable searches and seizures).
The facts found by the Court below stand unless clearly erroneous. State v. MacKenzie, 161 Me. 123, 210 A.2d 24. See Robbins v. MacKenzie (CA 1) 364 F.2d 45. In accepting the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Steele v. United States No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Judd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Samuel Rosencranz v. United States of America, Anthony Dipietro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- State v. SugarSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- State v. GregaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
- State v. RoachSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
- State v. KoucoulesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
- State v. LeggSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.