Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Federal Land Bank of New Orleans

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 24, 1935No. 3 Div. 115PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

Statutory action of ejectment by appellee against appellant.

[I] Plaintiff’s case rested upon a mortgage executed by defendant in February, 1930, the validity of which is not here in question. The mortgage was foreclosed under the pow er of sale therein contained, in April, 1932, and foreclosure deed duly executed, which was offered in evidence. State Bank of Elberta v. Peterson, 226 Ala. 13, 145 So. 154. The mortgage indebtedness was to run for a period of thirty years, the first installment becoming due November 1, 1930, and the remaining payments of that date of each…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Peterson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. City of Birmingham v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. Hopkins v. DuggarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  4. Naugher v. SparksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  5. Cowart v. AaronSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  2. Moorer v. Tensaw Land & Timber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  3. INTERNATIONAL UNION, ETC. v. PalmerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  4. Atlas Subsidiaries of Florida, Inc. v. KornegaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  5. Underwood v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API