Legal Opinion
Michael Anthony Crockett v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 24, 2014No. 12-CT-810PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McLEESE, Associate Judge:
Appellant Michael Crockett seeks reversal of his conviction for fleeing from a law-enforcement officer, arguing that he was prosecuted by the wrong governmental entity and that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. We affirm.
I
Viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, the evidence at trial established the following. In August 2011, Metropolitan Police Department Officer Brian Hal-lahan was driving north on Kansas Avenue NW, in a marked police cruiser. Officer Hallahan saw Mr. Crockett make an illegal U-turn and continue north onto Kansas…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Hollingsworth v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- United States v. Providence Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Gibson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- United States v. Bonnie Ann Durham, United States of America v. Jerome Sherman StanleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Stauffer v. Brooks Brothers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- District of Columbia v. ExxonMobil Oil Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- NATHANIEL COUSART v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- District of Columbia v. ExxonMobil Oil Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- District of Columbia v. ExxonMobil Oil Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017