Legal Opinion
Freeman v. Matlock
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided May 15, 1879PublishedCited by 10 opinions
From the Rush Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.
This was a suit by tbe appellants, against the appellee, on a promissory note, of which the following is a copy:
“ Connersville, Ind., March 29th, 1865.
“Eor the purpose of providing means to aid in the construction of the Junction Railroad, and in consideration thereof, I promise to pay, on the arrival of the first train of cars on said road at Rushville, Rush county, Ind., to the order of said Junction Railroad Company, at the bank of the State of Indiana, branch at Rushville, the sum of three hundred dollars, without relief from valuation or appraisement laws. If said road is not completed…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Brocaw v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Southard v. Arkansas Valley & W. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- State ex rel. Cutter v. KammanIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Southern Kansas & Panhandle Railroad v. TownerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
- Indianapolis, Delphi & Chicago Railroad v. HolmesIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.